MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events)
The pivotal Phase 3 trials and post-approval cardiovascular, kidney, and sleep-apnea outcome studies.
Definition
A composite endpoint used in cardiovascular outcomes trials, typically defined as cardiovascular death + nonfatal myocardial infarction + nonfatal stroke. GLP-1 cardiovascular trials report MACE as the primary endpoint: SELECT (semaglutide in obesity) showed 20% relative risk reduction, SUSTAIN-6 (semaglutide T2D) 26%, LEADER (liraglutide) 13%. Effect size correlates roughly with weight loss but extends beyond what weight reduction alone explains.
Top GLP-1 cardiovascular studies →
Definition curated by Weight Loss Rankings — sourced from FDA labels and peer-reviewed PubMed literature, never AI-generated summaries.
MACE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events) in plain English
MACE stands for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events. It is the composite endpoint cardiovascular outcome trials are built around, and in this field it almost always means three things counted together: death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal heart attack, and non-fatal stroke. Trials count the first of these to occur in each participant.
Composites exist for a practical reason. Individual events are rare enough that a trial powered to detect a change in heart attacks alone would need to be enormous. Bundling related outcomes makes the question answerable at a feasible size — at the cost of some precision, because a reduction in the composite does not tell you which component moved.
Three trials define what GLP-1 drugs do to MACE. LEADER followed 9,340 people with type 2 diabetes on liraglutide: the primary outcome occurred in 13.0% versus 14.9% on placebo, a hazard ratio of 0.87, with cardiovascular death down to 4.7% from 6.0%. SUSTAIN-6 tested semaglutide in type 2 diabetes and found the composite in 6.6% versus 8.9% (hazard ratio 0.74). SELECT extended the question to 17,604 people with heart disease and excess weight but no diabetes, finding 6.5% versus 8.0% (hazard ratio 0.80).
The confusion worth naming is between relative and absolute. A 20% relative reduction sounds transformative; in SELECT the absolute difference was 1.5 percentage points over nearly four years. Both numbers are true, and the second one is the one that describes your odds.
Where this becomes practical is coverage. A cardiovascular indication on a label is a different conversation with an insurer than a weight indication. If you have documented heart disease, make sure it is in the chart before a prior authorization goes in. Our SELECT analysis and secondary endpoint deep dive break the components apart.
Related terms in Major trials
Looking for more depth?
- Top GLP-1 cardiovascular studies
- Browse the full GLP-1 glossary (124 terms across 8 categories)
- Research articles — primary-source deep dives
- Tools and calculators
- Compare GLP-1 telehealth providers
Sources
- Lincoff AM et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2023 (SELECT), PMID 37952131
- Marso SP et al. Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016 (LEADER), PMID 27295427
- Marso SP et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016 (SUSTAIN-6), PMID 27633186