← All FDA warning letters

FDA Warning Letter · #728280

FITISH — FDA Warning Letter (June 8, 2026)

Issued June 8, 2026Status: activeCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)

Primary Source

View the original FDA letter on fda.gov →

https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/fitish-728280-06082026

Summary

Company
FITISH
Letter number
#728280
Issue date
June 8, 2026
Subject
False & Misleading Claims/Misbranded (Telehealth)

What FDA cited

This warning letter advises you of significant violations identified during a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review of your website. FDA observed that your website offers compounded drug products, including semaglutide and tirzepatide products.

Quoted verbatim from the FDA warning letter dated June 8, 2026

This letter notifies you of our concerns and provides you an opportunity to address them. If you have information that you believe demonstrates that your products are not in violation of the FD&C Act and FDA regulations, include that information for our consideration. If you cannot completely address this matter within fifteen (15) business days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which you will do so.

If you are not located in the U.S., please note that drug products that appear to be misbranded may be detained or refused admission. We may advise the appropriate regulatory officials in the country from which you operate that your drug products referenced above appear to be misbranded drug products that cannot be legally sold to consumers in the U.S.

1 The semaglutide and tirzepatide products offered on your website are drugs within the meaning of section 201(g) of the FD&C Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(g)] because they are intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of diseases and/or because they are intended to affect the structure or any function of the body. Further, they are “new drugs” within the meaning of section 201(p) of the FD&C Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(p)] because they are not generally recognized as safe and effective for their labeled uses.

2 See 21 C.F.R. § 201.1(h)(2) (“The appearance on a drug product label of a person’s name without qualification is a representation that the named person is the sole manufacturer of the product. That representation is false and misleading, and the drug product is misbranded under section 502(a) of the act, if the person is not the manufacturer of the product in accordance with this section.”); see also FD&C Act § 503(b) [21 U.S.C. § 353(b)], FD&C Act § 503B(a)(10)(A)(ii) [21 U.S.C. § 353b(a)(10)(A)(ii)]. We note that 21 C.F.R. § 201.1(a) does not apply to drug products dispensed in accordance with section 503(b)(1) of the FD&C Act [21 U.S.C. § 353(b)(1)]. However, see 45 Fed. Reg. 25760, 25765 (Apr. 15, 1980) (“…if the label of a prescription drug product dispensed by a pharmacist does contain a representation as to the manufacturer, packer, or distributor, it must comply with all the provisions of § 201.1….”). In addition, the labels of your drug products as depicted on the website do not indicate that they are dispensed under section 503(b)(1) of the FD&C Act [21 U.S.C. § 353(b)(1)], nor do they appear to comply with the requirements of section 503(b)(2) [21 U.S.C. § 353(b)(2)].

Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Quoted as a verbatim excerpt for editorial commentary; no claim is made beyond what FDA itself has published. The full letter is available at https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/fitish-728280-06082026

What FDA warning letters mean

A warning letter is FDA's principal means of telling a company that the agency considers something it's doing — a marketing claim, a manufacturing practice, a labeling choice — to violate the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Companies typically have 15 working days to respond.

A warning letter is not a recall, a criminal charge, or a finding that the company has broken the law. It is the start of a regulatory conversation. FDA may issue a close-out letter once it is satisfied that the company has corrected the cited issues.

For compounded GLP-1 telehealth providers, the most common citations involve unapproved new drug claims, misbranding, and the use of bulk drug substances not on FDA's approved list under FDCA sections 503A and 503B.

Other warning letters in our database

View the full database →

Editorial Disclaimer

FDA warning letters are public regulatory communications and do not, on their own, indicate that a company has done anything illegal. Companies often respond to warning letters with corrective action, and many letters are eventually closed out. The full text of this letter is available on fda.gov via the link above.

Key terms, explained

New to GLP-1s? Tap any term for a quick, plain-English definition.