FDA Warning Letter · #730390
Mint Med — FDA Warning Letter (June 8, 2026)
Legal name: Glow Medispa, LLC
Primary Source
View the original FDA letter on fda.gov →
https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/glow-medispa-llc-dba-mint-med-730390-06082026
Summary
- Company
- Glow Medispa, LLC (dba Mint Med)
- Letter number
- #730390
- Issue date
- June 8, 2026
- Subject
- False & Misleading Claims/Misbranded (Telehealth)
What FDA cited
This warning letter advises you of significant violations identified during a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review of your website. FDA observed that your website offers compounded drug products, including semaglutide and tirzepatide products.
From the letter
Read full letter on FDA.gov →Quoted verbatim from the FDA warning letter dated June 8, 2026
This letter notifies you of our concerns and provides you an opportunity to address them. If you have information that you believe demonstrates that your products are not in violation of the FD&C Act and FDA regulations, include that information for our consideration. If you cannot completely address this matter within fifteen (15) business days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which you will do so.
If you are not located in the U.S., please note that drug products that appear to be misbranded may be detained or refused admission. We may advise the appropriate regulatory officials in the country from which you operate that your drug products referenced above appear to be misbranded drug products that cannot be legally sold to consumers in the U.S.
1 The semaglutide and tirzepatide products offered on your website are drugs within the meaning of section 201(g) of the FD&C Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(g)] because they are intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of diseases and/or because they are intended to affect the structure or any function of the body. Further, they are “new drugs” within the meaning of section 201(p) of the FD&C Act [21 U.S.C. § 321(p)] because they are not generally recognized as safe and effective for their labeled uses.
2 See 21 C.F.R. § 201.1(h)(2) (“The appearance on a drug product label of a person’s name without qualification is a representation that the named person is the sole manufacturer of the product. That representation is false and misleading, and the drug product is misbranded under section 502(a) of the act, if the person is not the manufacturer of the product in accordance with this section.”); see also FD&C Act § 503(b) [21 U.S.C. § 353(b)], FD&C Act § 503B(a)(10)(A)(ii) [21 U.S.C. § 353b(a)(10)(A)(ii)]. We note that 21 C.F.R. § 201.1(a) does not apply to drug products dispensed in accordance with section 503(b)(1) of the FD&C Act [21 U.S.C. § 353(b)(1)]. However, see 45 Fed. Reg. 25760, 25765 (Apr. 15, 1980) (“…if the label of a prescription drug product dispensed by a pharmacist does contain a representation as to the manufacturer, packer, or distributor, it must comply with all the provisions of § 201.1….”). In addition, the labels of your drug products as depicted on the website do not indicate that they are dispensed under section 503(b)(1) of the FD&C Act [21 U.S.C. § 353(b)(1)], nor do they appear to comply with the requirements of section 503(b)(2) [21 U.S.C. § 353(b)(2)].
Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Quoted as a verbatim excerpt for editorial commentary; no claim is made beyond what FDA itself has published. The full letter is available at https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/glow-medispa-llc-dba-mint-med-730390-06082026
What FDA warning letters mean
A warning letter is FDA's principal means of telling a company that the agency considers something it's doing — a marketing claim, a manufacturing practice, a labeling choice — to violate the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Companies typically have 15 working days to respond.
A warning letter is not a recall, a criminal charge, or a finding that the company has broken the law. It is the start of a regulatory conversation. FDA may issue a close-out letter once it is satisfied that the company has corrected the cited issues.
For compounded GLP-1 telehealth providers, the most common citations involve unapproved new drug claims, misbranding, and the use of bulk drug substances not on FDA's approved list under FDCA sections 503A and 503B.
Other warning letters in our database
- Maximus — June 8, 2026
- altRx — June 8, 2026
- Ezra — June 8, 2026
- DrMedHealth — June 8, 2026
- D&H Medical Services — June 8, 2026
Editorial Disclaimer
FDA warning letters are public regulatory communications and do not, on their own, indicate that a company has done anything illegal. Companies often respond to warning letters with corrective action, and many letters are eventually closed out. The full text of this letter is available on fda.gov via the link above.
Key terms, explained
New to GLP-1s? Tap any term for a quick, plain-English definition.
- Compounded GLP-1 · Pharmacy and drug forms
- 503A pharmacy · Pharmacy and drug forms
- 503B outsourcing facility · Pharmacy and drug forms
- PCAB accreditation · Pharmacy and drug forms
- FDA Warning Letter · Insurance and regulatory
- Off-label use · Insurance and regulatory
- FDA Drug Shortage List · Insurance and regulatory