Ozempic vs Trulicity (2026): SUSTAIN-7 Head-to-Head, A1C, CV Outcomes
Ozempic (semaglutide, Novo Nordisk) vs Trulicity (dulaglutide, Eli Lilly)
Last verified 2026-05-28
The verdict
Ozempic (semaglutide) is the stronger T2D molecule head-to-head: SUSTAIN-7 at 40 weeks showed Ozempic 1 mg dropped A1C 1.8% and weight 6.5 kg, vs Trulicity 1.5 mg's 1.4% A1C and 3.0 kg. Both have FDA-approved cardiovascular indications, but the trials differ — SUSTAIN-6 showed Ozempic cut MACE 26% in a secondary-prevention cohort, while REWIND showed Trulicity cut MACE 12% across a larger primary-prevention population. Trulicity wins on pediatric labeling (ages 10+) and advanced kidney disease (AWARD-7). Both are weekly injections, T2D-only labels.
Side-by-side comparison
| Field | Ozempic | Trulicity |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanism | GLP-1 receptor agonist | GLP-1 receptor agonist |
| A1C reduction (SUSTAIN-7 head-to-head, 40 wk) | -1.8% (Ozempic 1 mg) | -1.4% (Trulicity 1.5 mg) |
| Weight loss (SUSTAIN-7 head-to-head, 40 wk) | -6.5 kg (Ozempic 1 mg) | -3.0 kg (Trulicity 1.5 mg) |
| FDA-approved indication | Type 2 diabetes; CV risk reduction in T2D + established CVD (adults only) | Type 2 diabetes (adults + pediatric ≥10); CV risk reduction in T2D ± CVD |
| Cardiovascular outcome trial | SUSTAIN-6: MACE -26% (HR 0.74, n=3,297, secondary-prevention bent) | REWIND: MACE -12% (HR 0.88, n=9,901, primary-prevention majority) |
| Advanced kidney disease (AWARD-7) | Not studied at this CKD stage in a dedicated head-to-head | A1C non-inferior to insulin glargine in stage 3-4 CKD; less eGFR decline |
| Dosing | Once-weekly subq; 0.25 → 0.5 → 1 → 2 mg | Once-weekly subq; 0.75 → 1.5 → 3 → 4.5 mg |
| Cash price (manufacturer programs) | ~$998/mo retail; NovoCare savings card limited to commercially insured T2D patients | ~$987/mo retail; Lilly $25 savings card for commercial insurance only |
Frequently asked questions
Should I switch from Trulicity to Ozempic for better A1C control?
Often yes, if A1C is the main driver. SUSTAIN-7 (Pratley 2018 Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, PMID 29397376) was the direct head-to-head: Ozempic 1 mg cut A1C 1.8% vs Trulicity 1.5 mg's 1.4%, and Ozempic 0.5 mg also beat Trulicity 0.75 mg. Weight loss was about twice as large with Ozempic. The trade-off is slightly more nausea and somewhat narrower coverage for some patient populations — ask your endocrinologist about a structured switch with 4 weeks at Ozempic 0.25 mg before stepping up.
Why does my insurance prefer Trulicity over Ozempic?
Several reasons. Trulicity launched in 2014 and has long-standing PBM contracts — many commercial formularies still tier it preferred over Ozempic. REWIND (Gerstein 2019 Lancet, PMID 31189511) also gave Trulicity an FDA cardiovascular-risk-reduction indication that does not require established CVD, whereas Ozempic's SUSTAIN-6 indication is narrower. Insurers also factor in pediatric labeling (Trulicity is approved for ages 10+) and the AWARD-7 kidney-disease data when building step-therapy criteria. A formulary exception with documented A1C failure on Trulicity 1.5 mg is the usual path to Ozempic.
Which is better for patients with kidney disease?
Trulicity has the stronger dedicated evidence in advanced CKD. AWARD-7 (Tuttle 2018 Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, PMID 29910024) enrolled patients with stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease and showed dulaglutide produced A1C reductions non-inferior to insulin glargine with less eGFR decline over 52 weeks. Ozempic's program has reasonable CKD data in REFLECT/FLOW and reassuring renal-safety signals in SUSTAIN-6, but no head-to-head against insulin or against Trulicity in this population. For T2D patients with eGFR 15-60 ml/min/1.73 m², Trulicity has the cleaner labeled CKD story.
Does Trulicity work for weight loss?
Modestly. Trulicity 1.5 mg typically produces 2-3 kg of weight loss in T2D trials — useful but well below semaglutide and tirzepatide. The higher Trulicity doses approved in 2020 (3 mg and 4.5 mg) push weight loss closer to 4-5 kg, but still not in the Ozempic range. Neither Trulicity nor Ozempic is FDA-approved for chronic weight management; that indication belongs to Wegovy (semaglutide 2.4 mg) and Zepbound (tirzepatide). Off-label use of Trulicity purely for weight loss in non-diabetic patients is rarely covered by insurance.
Which is approved for kids with type 2 diabetes?
Trulicity. The FDA approved dulaglutide for pediatric patients aged 10 and older with type 2 diabetes in 2022, based on the AWARD-PEDS trial. Ozempic is not approved for pediatric use — its label is restricted to adults. For an adolescent with T2D who needs a once-weekly GLP-1, Trulicity is the labeled option; semaglutide is not. Wegovy (the obesity-indicated semaglutide brand) does have a pediatric label for chronic weight management in adolescents 12+, but Ozempic itself does not.
Are the cardiovascular benefits the same?
No — they apply to different patient populations. SUSTAIN-6 (Marso 2016 NEJM, PMID 27633186) randomized 3,297 T2D patients at high CV risk and showed Ozempic cut major adverse cardiovascular events 26% (HR 0.74), but most participants had established cardiovascular disease. REWIND (Gerstein 2019 Lancet, PMID 31189511) randomized 9,901 T2D patients of whom only 31% had established CVD and showed Trulicity cut MACE 12% (HR 0.88) over a median 5.4 years. So Ozempic has the larger relative effect in secondary prevention; Trulicity has the only dedicated primary-prevention evidence base in T2D. Choose based on the patient's CV history.
References
- 1.Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jódar E, et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN-6). N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 27633186.
- 2.Pratley RE, Aroda VR, Lingvay I, Lüdemann J, Andreassen C, et al. Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018. PMID: 29397376.
- 3.Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, Diaz R, Lakshmanan M, et al. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 31189511.
- 4.Tuttle KR, Lakshmanan MC, Rayner B, Busch RS, Zimmermann AG, et al. Dulaglutide versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (AWARD-7): a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018. PMID: 29910024.
- 5.Novo Nordisk. OZEMPIC (semaglutide) injection — Prescribing Information. DailyMed (NIH/NLM). 2026. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=adec4fd2-6858-4c99-91d4-531f5f2a2d79
- 6.Eli Lilly and Company. TRULICITY (dulaglutide) injection — Prescribing Information. DailyMed (NIH/NLM). 2026. https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=463050bd-2b1c-40f5-b3c3-0a04bb433309
Related comparisons
- Wegovy vs Zepbound
- Ozempic vs Mounjaro
- Semaglutide vs Tirzepatide
- Rybelsus vs Ozempic
- Mounjaro vs Zepbound
- Foundayo vs Rybelsus
See the full drug-vs-drug verdict index or provider rankings.